Search

Data Reinforces ‘Don’t Ask for Feedback You Are Not Prepared to Act On’

Quantum Workplace Survey Also Shows Cadence Is an Important Factor

In the experience world, both for customer and employee, there is real risk in not responding to feedback. Both groups must feel like their voices are heard and that concerns will be addressed. If repeatedly asked for feedback without any follow-up, feedback participants will grow weary of the “ask” and ignore it moving forward. They will lose trust in the idea that their voices matter and become frustrated with the relationship.

For employees in this challenging and turbulent economy, it is more important than ever that companies are checking in with their staff members. Companies must continuously gauge employee sentiment, concerns, questions, and friction areas so that action can be taken to support staff. Monitoring for burnout will be an important task as companies seek to retain the employees they have.

However, collecting feedback, in whatever format or channel a company chooses, must be done thoughtfully and with an eye towards what action can be taken.

Recent data from Quantum Workplace showed that only 48% of employees say significant changes are made at their organizations as a result of employee feedback. For those employees working with leaders and managers who are exceptional at communicating and taking action on survey results, 95% are highly engaged. This is demonstrably bigger than the 34% high engagement reported by employees who say that kind of communication and action is nonexistent.

How does this disconnect happen? Potentially, a company has asked about too many initiatives that they cannot possibly take action on. Perhaps they are implementing changes, but they have done a poor job of communicating it back to employees and closing the loop. Or worse yet, there was silence on the feedback. Employees want transparency and if there are initiatives that simply will not be able to launch, even if they are of high importance to their employees, this communication must be made. Employers must work to provide a steady flow of accurate, timely, and empathic communications with their employees regarding any feedback or voice of the employee program.

On the positive side, the Quantum Workplace data did report actions being taken on a number of issues. Top actions taken after employee feedback was received via surveys include changes related to compensation and benefits, policy, and procedure changes, return to work or remote work, and communication. 

Cadence is another issue related to employee engagement. In the data, monthly surveying was associated with the highest level of engagement. However, it is often a hard balance, as those surveyed on a monthly basis also were more likely to say they were being over surveyed.

Source: Quantum Workplace

Quantum Workplace Lead Researcher Shane McFeely says, “Asking for employee feedback doesn’t increase engagement. Organizations need to find meaning in their survey data and make changes to improve the employee experience. Employees are more engaged when they see their employer actively trying to make work better every day and feel valued for providing feedback that improved their experience.” 

Author Information

As a detail-oriented researcher, Sherril is expert at discovering, gathering and compiling industry and market data to create clear, actionable market and competitive intelligence. With deep experience in market analysis and segmentation she is a consummate collaborator with strong communication skills adept at supporting and forming relationships with cross-functional teams in all levels of organizations.

She brings more than 20 years of experience in technology research and marketing; prior to her current role, she was a Research Analyst at Omdia, authoring market and ecosystem reports on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and User Interface technologies. Sherril was previously Manager of Market Research at Intrado Life and Safety, providing competitive analysis and intelligence, business development support, and analyst relations.

Sherril holds a Master of Business Administration in Marketing from University of Colorado, Boulder and a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from Rutgers University.

SHARE:

Latest Insights:

T-Mobile Raises 2024 Guidance Driven by Q1 2024 Service Revenue, Profitability, and High-Speed Internet Breakthroughs Plus Record Low Postpaid Phone Churn
The Futurum Group’s Ron Westfall and Daniel Newman examine T-Mobile’s Q1 2024 results and why they expect T-Mobile to fulfill its raised 2024 guidance as the company is outperforming its rivals across important mobile network service categories.
Generative AI-Powered Workflows Are Helping to Fuel Performance Across All Key Business Areas
The Futurum Group’s Daniel Newman and Keith Kirkpatrick cover ServiceNow’s Q1 2024 earnings and discuss how the company has successfully leveraged generative AI across its platform to drive revenue growth.
A Game-Changer in the Cloud Software Space
The Futurum Group’s Paul Nashawaty and Sam Holschuh provide their insights on the convergence of IBM, Red Hat, and now potentially HashiCorp and the compelling synergy in terms of developer tools, security offerings, and automation capabilities.

Latest Research:

In our latest Research Brief, The Case for Integrated Building Management: Achieving Operational Efficiency with Honeywell Enterprise Buildings Integrator, done in partnership with Honeywell, we analyze Honeywell’s EBI solution and how it addresses key customer pain points.
In this white paper, Operationalizing the Circular Economy: How HP is Reinventing Sustainability for the Tech Sector, you will learn the five fundamental challenges standing in the way of this transition, and how to address them.
Our latest research report, Endpoint Security Trends 2023, digs into modern attack techniques and how IT and security practitioners can most effectively respond and react, grounded in quantitative survey feedback.